Weetabix vs Coco pops Chocos
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weetabix | Coco pops Chocos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 355 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weetabix has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Weetabix has 81% less sugar (4.2 g vs 22 g).
- Weetabix has 58% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Weetabix has 40% more fiber (10 g vs 6 g).
- Weetabix has the better Nutri-Score.
- Weetabix is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Weetabix
Wholegrain _Wheat_ (95%), Malted _Barley_ Extract, Sugar, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Riboflavin (B2), Thiamin (B1), Folic Acid.
Coco pops Chocos
tarwemeel (72%), suiker, chocoladepoeder (10%) (suiker, cacaopoeder), cacaopoeder met verlaagd vetgehalte, glucosesiroop, zout, natuurlijk aroma, kaneel, niacine, ijzer, vitamine b6, riboflavine, thiamine, foliumzuur, vitamine d, vitamine b12
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weetabix or Coco pops Chocos?
Overall, Weetabix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weetabix has fewer calories: 355 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Weetabix has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 22 g per 100 g.