Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch vs Coco pops Chocos
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch | Coco pops Chocos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 380 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 9.3 g | 22 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 9.5 g | 6 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 20% less fat (1.8 g vs 2.2 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 58% less sugar (9.3 g vs 22 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 60% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 37% more fiber (9.5 g vs 6 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Wholewheat Flour, Sugar, Malted Barley Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Pantothenic Acid, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12.
Coco pops Chocos
tarwemeel (72%), suiker, chocoladepoeder (10%) (suiker, cacaopoeder), cacaopoeder met verlaagd vetgehalte, glucosesiroop, zout, natuurlijk aroma, kaneel, niacine, ijzer, vitamine b6, riboflavine, thiamine, foliumzuur, vitamine d, vitamine b12
FAQ
Which is healthier: Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch or Coco pops Chocos?
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 22 g per 100 g.