M&M\'s vs Minis
Overall, M&M\'s has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | M&M\'s | Minis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 524 kcal | 493 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 53 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 11 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans | Milk, Lait |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Minis has 19% less fat (21 g vs 26 g).
- M&M\'s has 18% less sugar (53 g vs 65 g).
- M&M\'s has 99% more fiber (2.1 g vs 0 g).
- M&M\'s has 44% more protein (9.8 g vs 5.5 g).
- Only M&M\'s lists: Peanuts, Soybeans.
- Only Minis lists: Lait.
Ingredients
M&M\'s
sucre, _cacahuètes_, pâte de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, amidon, matière grasse de palme, sirop de glucose, _lait_ écrémé en poudre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), _lactose_, stabilisant (gomme arabique), matière grasse de karité, matière grasse du _lait_, dextrine, agent d'enrobage (cire de carnauba), colorants (E100, E120, E133, E160a, E160e, E170), huile de palme, arômes, sel.
Minis
Sucre, pâte de cacao, lait écrémé en poudre, beurre de cacao, perméat de lactosérum (lait), matière grasse du lait, amidon, matière grasse de palme, matière grasse de karité
FAQ
Which is healthier: M&M\'s or Minis?
Overall, M&M\'s has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Minis has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 524 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
M&M\'s has less sugar: 53 g versus 65 g per 100 g.