Comparison
Miso Rojo vs Muslo de pato
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miso Rojo | Muslo de pato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 165 kcal | 278 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 7.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 11.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miso Rojo has 41% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 278 kcal).
- Miso Rojo has 79% less fat (3.8 g vs 18 g).
- Miso Rojo has 85% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 94% less sugar (0.5 g vs 7.7 g).
- Muslo de pato has 88% less salt (1.4 g vs 11.6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 62% more protein (29 g vs 11.1 g).
- Muslo de pato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Miso Rojo lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Miso Rojo
soja, arroz,sal, alcohol
Muslo de pato
1 muslo de pato (85%), grasa de pato, sal y conservador: E-250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miso Rojo or Muslo de pato?
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Miso Rojo has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 278 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 7.7 g per 100 g.