Comparison
Muslo de pato vs Garfitps sabor queso
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muslo de pato | Garfitps sabor queso |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 278 kcal | 509 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 9.2 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 6.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muslo de pato has 45% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 509 kcal).
- Muslo de pato has 25% less fat (18 g vs 24 g).
- Garfitps sabor queso has 48% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 9.2 g).
- Muslo de pato has 45% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Muslo de pato has 76% more protein (29 g vs 6.9 g).
- Muslo de pato has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Muslo de pato
1 muslo de pato (85%), grasa de pato, sal y conservador: E-250.
Garfitps sabor queso
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muslo de pato or Garfitps sabor queso?
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muslo de pato has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 509 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 9.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Muslo de pato vs Crema de jamón york con...
Cherry loves chicolate vs Muslo de pato
Garfitps sabor queso vs Crema de jamón york con...
Cherry loves chicolate vs Garfitps sabor queso
Cubanitos vs Muslo de pato
Cubanitos vs Garfitps sabor queso
Miso Rojo vs Muslo de pato
Miso Rojo vs Garfitps sabor queso