Comparison
Cherry loves chicolate vs Muslo de pato
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cherry loves chicolate | Muslo de pato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 414 kcal | 278 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 31 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muslo de pato has 33% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 414 kcal).
- Muslo de pato has 10% less fat (18 g vs 20 g).
- Muslo de pato has 45% less saturated fat (6 g vs 11 g).
- Muslo de pato has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 31 g).
- Cherry loves chicolate has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Muslo de pato has 75% more protein (29 g vs 7.2 g).
- Muslo de pato has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cherry loves chicolate
Not available.
Muslo de pato
1 muslo de pato (85%), grasa de pato, sal y conservador: E-250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cherry loves chicolate or Muslo de pato?
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muslo de pato has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 414 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 31 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Muslo de pato vs Crema de jamón york con...
Muslo de pato vs Garfitps sabor queso
Cherry loves chicolate vs Crema de jamón york con...
Cherry loves chicolate vs Garfitps sabor queso
Cubanitos vs Muslo de pato
Cherry loves chicolate vs Cubanitos
Miso Rojo vs Muslo de pato
Miso Rojo vs Cherry loves chicolate