Cubanitos vs Muslo de pato
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cubanitos | Muslo de pato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 491 kcal | 278 kcal |
| Fat | 21.6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.6 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 38.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 6 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muslo de pato has 43% fewer calories (278 kcal vs 491 kcal).
- Muslo de pato has 17% less fat (18 g vs 21.6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 43% less saturated fat (6 g vs 10.6 g).
- Muslo de pato has 99% less sugar (0.5 g vs 38.4 g).
- Cubanitos has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Muslo de pato has 84% more protein (29 g vs 4.7 g).
- Muslo de pato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Muslo de pato is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Cubanitos lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Cubanitos
crema 55% (azúcar,grasa vegetal de palma,almidón de maíz y aroma),harina de trigo, emulgente ( lecitina de soja ), gasificantes ( bicarbonato sódico y bicarbonato amónico ), sal y colorante carmín.
Muslo de pato
1 muslo de pato (85%), grasa de pato, sal y conservador: E-250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cubanitos or Muslo de pato?
Overall, Muslo de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muslo de pato has fewer calories: 278 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 38.4 g per 100 g.