Miettes de thon à l huile de tournesol vs Atum em posta em óleo vegetal
Overall, Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Miettes de thon à l huile de tournesol
Atum em posta em óleo vegetal
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miettes de thon à l huile de... | Atum em posta em óleo vegeta... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 236 kcal | 193 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has 18% fewer calories (193 kcal vs 236 kcal).
- Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has 38% less fat (10 g vs 16 g).
- Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has 25% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Miettes de thon à l huile de tournesol
THON, huile de tournesol, sel
Atum em posta em óleo vegetal
_Atum_ (65%), óleo vegetal (girassol) (34%), sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miettes de thon à l huile de tournesol or Atum em posta em óleo vegetal?
Overall, Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Atum em posta em óleo vegetal has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Miettes de thon à l huile de tournesol has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.