Mieszanka studencka vs Cóctel mix crudo natural
Overall, Cóctel mix crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mieszanka studencka | Cóctel mix crudo natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 518 kcal | 584 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 50 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 30 g | 9.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 7.4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 20.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Peanuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mieszanka studencka has 11% fewer calories (518 kcal vs 584 kcal).
- Mieszanka studencka has 30% less fat (35 g vs 50 g).
- Cóctel mix crudo natural has 68% less sugar (9.7 g vs 30 g).
- Mieszanka studencka has 26% more fiber (10 g vs 7.4 g).
- Cóctel mix crudo natural has 28% more protein (20.7 g vs 15 g).
- Cóctel mix crudo natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cóctel mix crudo natural is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Mieszanka studencka lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Mieszanka studencka
Rodzynki Jumbo 35% (rodzynki Jumbo, olej słonecznikowy, orzechy laskowe 15%, orzechy nerkowca 15%, migdały 15%, orzechy ziemne prażone 13%, chipsy bananowe 7% (banany, olej kokosowy, cukier, aromat).
Cóctel mix crudo natural
Pipas de calabaza 25%, _nueces_ 20%, _avellanas_ 20%, _almendras_ 20%, uvas pasas 10%, _pistachos_ 5%, aceite de girasol.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mieszanka studencka or Cóctel mix crudo natural?
Overall, Cóctel mix crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mieszanka studencka has fewer calories: 518 kcal versus 584 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cóctel mix crudo natural has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 30 g per 100 g.