Comparison
MDH Dal Makhani Masala vs Dal makhani
Overall, Dal makhani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | MDH Dal Makhani Masala | Dal makhani |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 261 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 12.8 g | 7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 5.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dal makhani has 54% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 261 kcal).
- Dal makhani has 45% less fat (7 g vs 12.8 g).
- MDH Dal Makhani Masala has no saturated fat, while Dal makhani has 0.7 g.
- MDH Dal Makhani Masala has no sugar, while Dal makhani has 0.4 g.
- Dal makhani has 78% less salt (1.2 g vs 5.5 g).
- MDH Dal Makhani Masala has 77% more protein (14 g vs 3.2 g).
- Dal makhani has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
MDH Dal Makhani Masala
Not available.
Dal makhani
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: MDH Dal Makhani Masala or Dal makhani?
Overall, Dal makhani has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dal makhani has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 261 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
MDH Dal Makhani Masala has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.