Comparison

McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x vs Parle-G

Overall, McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMcVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2...Parle-G
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 459 kcal 454 kcal
Fat 15.5 g 13 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 6 g
Sugars 20.2 g 25.5 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.9 g —
Protein 7 g 6.9 g
Additives45
AllergensGlutenGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Parle-G has 16% less fat (13 g vs 15.5 g).
  • McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has 75% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 6 g).
  • McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has 21% less sugar (20.2 g vs 25.5 g).
  • McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Parle-G lists: Milk.

Ingredients

McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x

Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Sugar, Vegetable Oil (Sunflower), Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Barley Malt Extract, Raising Agents (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate), Salt.

Parle-G

REFINED WHEAT FLOUR (MAIDA ) - 68%, SUGAR, REFINED PALM OIL, INVERT SUGAR SYRUP# [SUGAR, CITRIC ACID], IODISED SALT, RAISING AGENTS [503 (ii), 500 (ii)], MILK SOLIDS, FLOUR TREATMENT AGENT [1101 (i)] AND EMULSIFIER OF VEGETABLE ORIGIN [472e], CONTAINS ADDED FLAVOUR ( ARTIFICIAL FLAVOURING SUBSTANCES - VANILLA) (D-GLUCOSE, LEVULOSE)

FAQ

Which is healthier: McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x or Parle-G?

Overall, McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Parle-G has fewer calories: 454 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x has less sugar: 20.2 g versus 25.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons