Gerlinea Moelleux vs McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x
Overall, Gerlinea Moelleux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gerlinea Moelleux | McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 411 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 15.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 20.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gerlinea Moelleux has 10% fewer calories (411 kcal vs 459 kcal).
- Gerlinea Moelleux has 16% less sugar (17 g vs 20.2 g).
- Gerlinea Moelleux has 76% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Gerlinea Moelleux has 68% more fiber (9 g vs 2.9 g).
- Gerlinea Moelleux has 50% more protein (14 g vs 7 g).
- Gerlinea Moelleux has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Gerlinea Moelleux
Not available.
McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x
Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Sugar, Vegetable Oil (Sunflower), Glucose-Fructose Syrup, Barley Malt Extract, Raising Agents (Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Bicarbonate), Salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gerlinea Moelleux or McVitie's Rich Tea Classic 2 x?
Overall, Gerlinea Moelleux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gerlinea Moelleux has fewer calories: 411 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gerlinea Moelleux has less sugar: 17 g versus 20.2 g per 100 g.