Matière grasse a tartiner vs Light boter
Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matière grasse a tartiner | Light boter |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 498 kcal | 226 kcal |
| Fat | 55 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Light boter has 55% fewer calories (226 kcal vs 498 kcal).
- Light boter has 55% less fat (25 g vs 55 g).
- Light boter has 72% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 16 g).
- Light boter has no sugar, while Matière grasse a tartiner has 0.5 g.
- Light boter has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
- Matière grasse a tartiner has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Light boter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Matière grasse a tartiner
Huiles et graisses végétales non hydrogénées (tournesol 27,5% min, palme, colza, palmiste) , eau , émulsifiants : E471, lécithine de tournesol , sel (0,3%) , conservateur : E202 , correcteur d'acidité : E330 , colorant : E160aii , arôme,
Light boter
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matière grasse a tartiner or Light boter?
Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Light boter has fewer calories: 226 kcal versus 498 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Light boter has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.