Comparison

Light boter vs Original

Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLight boterOriginal
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 226 kcal 443 kcal
Fat 25 g 50 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 2 g
Sugars 0 g 8 g
Salt 0.3 g 1.4 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Light boter has 49% fewer calories (226 kcal vs 443 kcal).
  • Light boter has 50% less fat (25 g vs 50 g).
  • Original has 56% less saturated fat (2 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Light boter has no sugar, while Original has 8 g.
  • Light boter has 79% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Light boter has 100% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Original has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Light boter is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Original lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Light boter

Not available.

Original

óleos vegetais (girassol (25%), linhaça, soja e colza em proporções variáveis), matérias gordas vegetais (gordura de palmiste** e estearina de palma**, em proporções variáveis), água, sal (1,4%), emulsionantes (lecitina, mono e diglicéridos de ácidos gordos), soro de LEITE em pó, conservante (sorbato de potássio), regulador de acidez (ácido cítrico), aromas naturais, corante (carotenos), vitamina E, vitamina A e vitamina D.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Light boter or Original?

Overall, Light boter has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Light boter has fewer calories: 226 kcal versus 443 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Light boter has less sugar: 0 g versus 8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons