Matcha + Collagen vs Sweet Matcha
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha + Collagen | Sweet Matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 400 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 90 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | — |
| Protein | 50 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha + Collagen has 11% fewer calories (357 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Matcha + Collagen has no sugar, while Sweet Matcha has 90 g.
- Matcha + Collagen has 100% more protein (50 g vs 0 g).
- Sweet Matcha is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Matcha + Collagen
Collagen Peptides, Modified Food Starch, Matcha Green Tea Powder, Silicon Dioxide (flow agent), Natural Flavor, Stevia Leaf Extract
Sweet Matcha
Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha + Collagen or Sweet Matcha?
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha + Collagen has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha + Collagen has less sugar: 0 g versus 90 g per 100 g.