Comparison

Sweet Matcha vs Pure Matcha Powder

Overall, Pure Matcha Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSweet MatchaPure Matcha Powder
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 400 kcal 5 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 90 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pure Matcha Powder has 99% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 400 kcal).
  • Pure Matcha Powder has no sugar, while Sweet Matcha has 90 g.
  • Pure Matcha Powder has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pure Matcha Powder is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Sweet Matcha

Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic

Pure Matcha Powder

100% pur poudre de matcha.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sweet Matcha or Pure Matcha Powder?

Overall, Pure Matcha Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pure Matcha Powder has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pure Matcha Powder has less sugar: 0 g versus 90 g per 100 g.

More comparisons