Comparison
Sweet Matcha vs Matcha
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Matcha | Matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 11.3 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 37 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet Matcha has no fat, while Matcha has 6.5 g.
- Sweet Matcha has no saturated fat, while Matcha has 0.8 g.
- Matcha has 98% less sugar (2 g vs 90 g).
- Matcha has 100% more protein (37 g vs 0 g).
- Matcha has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sweet Matcha
Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic
Matcha
Pulbere din frunze Ceai-verde
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Matcha or Matcha?
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha has less sugar: 2 g versus 90 g per 100 g.