Matcha vs Bio Matcha Latte
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha | Bio Matcha Latte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 200 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 28.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 11.3 g | — |
| Protein | 37 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Matcha Latte has 45% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 362 kcal).
- Bio Matcha Latte has 28% less fat (4.7 g vs 6.5 g).
- Matcha has 80% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 4 g).
- Matcha has 93% less sugar (2 g vs 28.7 g).
- Matcha has 98% more protein (37 g vs 0.7 g).
- Matcha has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Matcha
Pulbere din frunze Ceai-verde
Bio Matcha Latte
Bio třtinový cukr, bio kokosový prášek (25%), bio sušený rýžový sirup, bio mletý zelený čaj matcha - Camellia sinensis (5,7 %), bio maltodextrin, přírodní aroma, zahušťovadlo: xanthanová guma, protispékavá látka: vinany draselné.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha or Bio Matcha Latte?
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Matcha Latte has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha has less sugar: 2 g versus 28.7 g per 100 g.