Sweet Matcha vs Bio Matcha Latte
Overall, Bio Matcha Latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Matcha | Bio Matcha Latte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 200 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 28.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Matcha Latte has 50% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Sweet Matcha has no fat, while Bio Matcha Latte has 4.7 g.
- Sweet Matcha has no saturated fat, while Bio Matcha Latte has 4 g.
- Bio Matcha Latte has 68% less sugar (28.7 g vs 90 g).
- Bio Matcha Latte has 100% more protein (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Bio Matcha Latte has the better Nutri-Score.
- Sweet Matcha is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sweet Matcha
Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic
Bio Matcha Latte
Bio třtinový cukr, bio kokosový prášek (25%), bio sušený rýžový sirup, bio mletý zelený čaj matcha - Camellia sinensis (5,7 %), bio maltodextrin, přírodní aroma, zahušťovadlo: xanthanová guma, protispékavá látka: vinany draselné.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Matcha or Bio Matcha Latte?
Overall, Bio Matcha Latte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Matcha Latte has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Matcha Latte has less sugar: 28.7 g versus 90 g per 100 g.