Comparison
Sweet Matcha vs Matcha Vainilla
Overall, Matcha Vainilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Matcha | Matcha Vainilla |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha Vainilla has 82% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 400 kcal).
- Matcha Vainilla has no sugar, while Sweet Matcha has 90 g.
- Matcha Vainilla has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sweet Matcha
Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic
Matcha Vainilla
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Matcha or Matcha Vainilla?
Overall, Matcha Vainilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha Vainilla has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha Vainilla has less sugar: 0 g versus 90 g per 100 g.