Matcha + Collagen vs Bio matcha prášek
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha + Collagen | Bio matcha prášek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 29.8 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio matcha prášek has 15% fewer calories (305 kcal vs 357 kcal).
- Matcha + Collagen has no fat, while Bio matcha prášek has 3.2 g.
- Matcha + Collagen has no saturated fat, while Bio matcha prášek has 0.7 g.
- Matcha + Collagen has no sugar, while Bio matcha prášek has 1.7 g.
- Bio matcha prášek has 76% more fiber (29.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Matcha + Collagen has 50% more protein (50 g vs 24.8 g).
- Only Bio matcha prášek lists: None.
Ingredients
Matcha + Collagen
Collagen Peptides, Modified Food Starch, Matcha Green Tea Powder, Silicon Dioxide (flow agent), Natural Flavor, Stevia Leaf Extract
Bio matcha prášek
Bio Matcha prášek z listů zeleného čaje (Camellia sinensis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha + Collagen or Bio matcha prášek?
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio matcha prášek has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha + Collagen has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.