Comparison
Matcha en poudre vs Bio matcha prášek
Overall, Bio matcha prášek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha en poudre | Bio matcha prášek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 393 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 29.8 g |
| Protein | 24.9 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio matcha prášek has 22% fewer calories (305 kcal vs 393 kcal).
- Bio matcha prášek has 45% less fat (3.2 g vs 5.8 g).
- Bio matcha prášek has 63% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
- Bio matcha prášek has 69% less sugar (1.7 g vs 5.5 g).
- Bio matcha prášek has 100% more fiber (29.8 g vs 0 g).
- Only Bio matcha prášek lists: None.
Ingredients
Matcha en poudre
Matcha
Bio matcha prášek
Bio Matcha prášek z listů zeleného čaje (Camellia sinensis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha en poudre or Bio matcha prášek?
Overall, Bio matcha prášek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio matcha prášek has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio matcha prášek has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.