Comparison
Matcha vs Bio matcha prášek
Overall, Bio matcha prášek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha | Bio matcha prášek |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 362 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 11.3 g | 29.8 g |
| Protein | 37 g | 24.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio matcha prášek has 16% fewer calories (305 kcal vs 362 kcal).
- Bio matcha prášek has 51% less fat (3.2 g vs 6.5 g).
- Bio matcha prášek has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Bio matcha prášek has 62% more fiber (29.8 g vs 11.3 g).
- Matcha has 33% more protein (37 g vs 24.8 g).
- Only Bio matcha prášek lists: None.
Ingredients
Matcha
Pulbere din frunze Ceai-verde
Bio matcha prášek
Bio Matcha prášek z listů zeleného čaje (Camellia sinensis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha or Bio matcha prášek?
Overall, Bio matcha prášek has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio matcha prášek has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio matcha prášek has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.