Matcha + Collagen vs Matcha
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha + Collagen | Matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 357 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 11.3 g |
| Protein | 50 g | 37 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha + Collagen has no fat, while Matcha has 6.5 g.
- Matcha + Collagen has no saturated fat, while Matcha has 0.8 g.
- Matcha + Collagen has no sugar, while Matcha has 2 g.
- Matcha has 37% more fiber (11.3 g vs 7.1 g).
- Matcha + Collagen has 26% more protein (50 g vs 37 g).
Ingredients
Matcha + Collagen
Collagen Peptides, Modified Food Starch, Matcha Green Tea Powder, Silicon Dioxide (flow agent), Natural Flavor, Stevia Leaf Extract
Matcha
Pulbere din frunze Ceai-verde
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha + Collagen or Matcha?
Overall, Matcha + Collagen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha + Collagen has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 362 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha + Collagen has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.