Comparison
Matcha en poudre vs Matcha
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Matcha en poudre | Matcha |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 393 kcal | 362 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 5.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 11.3 g |
| Protein | 24.9 g | 37 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matcha en poudre has 11% less fat (5.8 g vs 6.5 g).
- Matcha has 58% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.9 g).
- Matcha has 64% less sugar (2 g vs 5.5 g).
- Matcha has 100% more fiber (11.3 g vs 0 g).
- Matcha has 33% more protein (37 g vs 24.9 g).
Ingredients
Matcha en poudre
Matcha
Matcha
Pulbere din frunze Ceai-verde
FAQ
Which is healthier: Matcha en poudre or Matcha?
Overall, Matcha has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha has fewer calories: 362 kcal versus 393 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha has less sugar: 2 g versus 5.5 g per 100 g.