Comparison
Sweet Matcha vs Matcha en poudre
Overall, Matcha en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sweet Matcha | Matcha en poudre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 393 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Sugars | 90 g | 5.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 24.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sweet Matcha has no fat, while Matcha en poudre has 5.8 g.
- Sweet Matcha has no saturated fat, while Matcha en poudre has 1.9 g.
- Matcha en poudre has 94% less sugar (5.5 g vs 90 g).
- Matcha en poudre has 100% more protein (24.9 g vs 0 g).
- Matcha en poudre has the better Nutri-Score.
- Matcha en poudre is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sweet Matcha
Cane Sugar*, Matcha*, *Organic
Matcha en poudre
Matcha
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sweet Matcha or Matcha en poudre?
Overall, Matcha en poudre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matcha en poudre has fewer calories: 393 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matcha en poudre has less sugar: 5.5 g versus 90 g per 100 g.