Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl vs Brottrunk
Overall, Brottrunk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilo... | Brottrunk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 5 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brottrunk has 89% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Brottrunk has 67% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Brottrunk has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Brottrunk has no sugar, while Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 3.9 g.
- Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 86% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Brottrunk lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl
Not available.
Brottrunk
Quellwasser, Vollkornbrot (_Roggenvollkornmehl**_, Wasser, _Weizenvollkornmehl**_, Natursauerteig [_Roggenvollkornmehl**_, Wasser], Salz, _Hafervollkornmehl**_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl or Brottrunk?
Overall, Brottrunk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brottrunk has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brottrunk has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.