Comparison

Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl vs Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio

Overall, Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMaślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilo...Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bi...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 46 kcal 42 kcal
Fat 1.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0 g
Sugars 3.9 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 0.1 g
Protein 3.6 g 0.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has no fat, while Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 1.5 g.
  • Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has no saturated fat, while Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 1.2 g.
  • Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has 74% less sugar (1 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 97% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Only Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio lists: None.

Ingredients

Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl

Not available.

Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio

Eau filtrée, véritables grains de kéfir de fruits vivants, framboises*, citrons frais*, figues séchées*, sucre de canne* (disparaît durant la fermentation), jus de gingembre frais*,jus de baies de Goji fraîches* *ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique contrôlée, certifié par FR-BIO 09 Non pasteurisé

FAQ

Which is healthier: Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl or Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio?

Overall, Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has fewer calories: 42 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kéfir de fruits Gingembre bio has less sugar: 1 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons