Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl vs Passion & hops
Overall, Passion & hops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilo... | Passion & hops |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 10 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Passion & hops has 78% fewer calories (10 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Passion & hops has 87% less fat (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Passion & hops has 92% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Passion & hops has 38% less sugar (2.4 g vs 3.9 g).
- Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has 93% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl
Not available.
Passion & hops
Waterkefir (gefilterd water, kefir cultuur, suiker* (deels omgezet door fermentatie), citroenconcentraat*), passievruchtsap (2%)*, natuurlijke groene thee extract*, Simcoe hop (0.05%)*, *biologische landbouw
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maślanka Naturalna 1,5% Pilos Lidl or Passion & hops?
Overall, Passion & hops has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Passion & hops has fewer calories: 10 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Passion & hops has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.