Comparison

Makrelfilet i tomat vs Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMakrelfilet i tomatFiletes de Caballa del Sur e...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 157 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 10 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 1.7 g
Sugars 1.9 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.8 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.7 g
Protein 14 g 17.9 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, FiskFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 10% fewer calories (141 kcal vs 157 kcal).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 36% less fat (6.4 g vs 10 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 23% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 63% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has 22% more protein (17.9 g vs 14 g).
  • Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Makrelfilet i tomat lists: Fisk.

Ingredients

Makrelfilet i tomat

Makrelfilet (fisk, Scomber scombrus) 64%, vand, tomatkoncentrat 12%, salt.

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate

_Caballa del sur_ (_pescado_) (65%), salsa de tomate (34%) (agua, concentrado de tomate, aceite de girasol) y sal.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Makrelfilet i tomat or Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate?

Overall, Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filetes de Caballa del Sur en Tomate has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons