Comparison

Makrelfilet i tomat vs Stabbur-Makrell Grovhakket Filet i tomatsaus

Overall, Makrelfilet i tomat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMakrelfilet i tomatStabbur-Makrell Grovhakket F...
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 157 kcal 238 kcal
Fat 10 g 19 g
Saturated fat 2.2 g 3.1 g
Sugars 1.9 g 3.8 g
Salt 0.8 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.8 g
Protein 14 g 12 g
Additives04
AllergensFish, FiskFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Makrelfilet i tomat has 34% fewer calories (157 kcal vs 238 kcal).
  • Makrelfilet i tomat has 47% less fat (10 g vs 19 g).
  • Makrelfilet i tomat has 29% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Makrelfilet i tomat has 50% less sugar (1.9 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Stabbur-Makrell Grovhakket Filet i tomatsaus has 73% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Makrelfilet i tomat has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
  • Makrelfilet i tomat has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Makrelfilet i tomat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Makrelfilet i tomat lists: Fisk.

Ingredients

Makrelfilet i tomat

Makrelfilet (fisk, Scomber scombrus) 64%, vand, tomatkoncentrat 12%, salt.

Stabbur-Makrell Grovhakket Filet i tomatsaus

Makrellfilet 60 %, tomatsaus 40 % (tomatpuré, vann, rapsolje, sukker, salt, antioksidant (askorbinsyre, sitronsyre), fortykningsmiddel (guarkjernemel, xantangummi)).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Makrelfilet i tomat or Stabbur-Makrell Grovhakket Filet i tomatsaus?

Overall, Makrelfilet i tomat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Makrelfilet i tomat has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 238 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Makrelfilet i tomat has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons