Maki California Thon Avocat vs Maki
Overall, Maki California Thon Avocat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maki California Thon Avocat | Maki |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 187 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 9.2 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | — |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 4.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Mustard, Sesame seeds | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Maki has 12% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 187 kcal).
- Maki has 60% less fat (3.7 g vs 9.2 g).
- Maki has 67% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Maki California Thon Avocat has 59% less sugar (3 g vs 7.4 g).
- Maki California Thon Avocat has 77% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Maki California Thon Avocat has 29% more protein (6.5 g vs 4.6 g).
- Maki California Thon Avocat has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Maki California Thon Avocat lists: Fish, Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Maki California Thon Avocat
Riz vinaigré [eau, riz, vinaigre à sushi [vinaigre d'alcool, sucre, sel, extrait de kelp], jus de citron, huile de tournesol, sel], mélange thon mayo [thon cuit [thon (poisson), eau, sel], mayonnaise [huile de colza, eau, sirop de glucose-fructose, vinaigre d'alcool, amidon modifié, sel, graines de moutarde, stabilisant : E415, épices]], avocat, sésame blanc, algues. Peut contenir : soja, œuf, céleri, crustacés, céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque, lait, arachide, sulfites.
Maki
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maki California Thon Avocat or Maki?
Overall, Maki California Thon Avocat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Maki has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 187 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maki California Thon Avocat has less sugar: 3 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.