Comparison
Lupin vs Lupini in salamoia
Overall, Lupin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lupin | Lupini in salamoia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 109 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 8.5 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Lupin | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lupin has 11% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 123 kcal).
- Lupini in salamoia has 36% less salt (2.9 g vs 4.6 g).
- Lupin has 35% more fiber (13 g vs 8.5 g).
- Only Lupin lists: Lupin.
Ingredients
Lupin
Lupin, eau, sel, E330
Lupini in salamoia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lupin or Lupini in salamoia?
Overall, Lupin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lupin has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 123 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lupin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.