Louisiana Flusskrebse vs Écrevisses de Louisiane
Overall, Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Écrevisses de Louisiane
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Louisiana Flusskrebse | Écrevisses de Louisiane |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Louisiana Flusskrebse lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Procambarus clarkii, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure, Milchsäure.
Écrevisses de Louisiane
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Louisiana Flusskrebse or Écrevisses de Louisiane?
Overall, Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Louisiana Flusskrebse has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Louisiana Flusskrebse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.