Comparison

Chair d'écrevisses cuites vs Écrevisses de Louisiane

Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChair d'écrevisses cuitesÉcrevisses de Louisiane
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 86 kcal 91 kcal
Fat 1.1 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 19 g 19 g
Additives10
AllergensCrustaceansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Écrevisses de Louisiane has no sugar, while Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 0.5 g.
  • Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 32% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chair d'écrevisses cuites lists: Crustaceans.

Ingredients

Chair d'écrevisses cuites

Chair d'_écrevisses_ (Procambarus clarkii - cambaridae), sel non iodé, vinaigre nature, correcteur d'acidité (E270).

Écrevisses de Louisiane

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chair d'écrevisses cuites or Écrevisses de Louisiane?

Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chair d'écrevisses cuites has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Écrevisses de Louisiane has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons