Farfale Famtasia vs Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Overall, Farfale Famtasia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farfale Famtasia | Chair d'écrevisses cuites |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 86 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farfale Famtasia has 22% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 86 kcal).
- Farfale Famtasia has 55% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has no sugar, while Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 0.5 g.
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Only Chair d'écrevisses cuites lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Farfale Famtasia
Not available.
Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Chair d'_écrevisses_ (Procambarus clarkii - cambaridae), sel non iodé, vinaigre nature, correcteur d'acidité (E270).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farfale Famtasia or Chair d'écrevisses cuites?
Overall, Farfale Famtasia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farfale Famtasia has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farfale Famtasia has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.