Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais vs Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais
Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crevette d'écrevisses rouges... | Chair d'écrevisses cuites |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 86 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 18.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais has 56% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 86 kcal).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 73% less fat (1.1 g vs 4 g).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 93% less salt (1.3 g vs 18.4 g).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 100% more protein (19 g vs 0 g).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chair d'écrevisses cuites lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais
Not available.
Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Chair d'_écrevisses_ (Procambarus clarkii - cambaridae), sel non iodé, vinaigre nature, correcteur d'acidité (E270).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais or Chair d'écrevisses cuites?
Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crevette d'écrevisses rouges des marais has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.