Louisiana Flusskrebse vs Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Louisiana Flusskrebse | Chair d'écrevisses cuites |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 86 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | Crustaceans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Louisiana Flusskrebse has no sugar, while Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 0.5 g.
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has 28% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Procambarus clarkii, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure, Milchsäure.
Chair d'écrevisses cuites
Chair d'_écrevisses_ (Procambarus clarkii - cambaridae), sel non iodé, vinaigre nature, correcteur d'acidité (E270).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Louisiana Flusskrebse or Chair d'écrevisses cuites?
Overall, Chair d'écrevisses cuites has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chair d'écrevisses cuites has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Louisiana Flusskrebse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.