Flusskrebssalat vs Farfale Famtasia
Overall, Farfale Famtasia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flusskrebssalat | Farfale Famtasia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 67 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 5.8 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Eggs, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farfale Famtasia has 80% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 343 kcal).
- Farfale Famtasia has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 32 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has no sugar, while Flusskrebssalat has 7.2 g.
- Flusskrebssalat has 32% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has 61% more protein (15 g vs 5.8 g).
- Farfale Famtasia has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Flusskrebssalat lists: Crustaceans, Eggs, Mustard.
Ingredients
Flusskrebssalat
Louisiana-Flusskrebsfleisch (Procambarus clarki) 35%, Rapsöl, Äpfel, Porree, Zucker, Eigelb, Knoblauch, Tomatenmark, Kräuter, Gewürze, Speisesalz, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Essigsäure; Säureregulator: Natriumacetate; Traubenzucker, Maltodextrine, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Xanthan; Aroma.
Farfale Famtasia
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flusskrebssalat or Farfale Famtasia?
Overall, Farfale Famtasia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farfale Famtasia has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farfale Famtasia has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.2 g per 100 g.