Louisiana Flusskrebse vs Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiquées
Overall, Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiquées
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Louisiana Flusskrebse | Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiq... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 17.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Louisiana Flusskrebse has 31% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Louisiana Flusskrebse lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Procambarus clarkii, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure, Milchsäure.
Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiquées
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Louisiana Flusskrebse or Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiquées?
Overall, Louisiana Flusskrebse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queues d'Ecrevisses décortiquées has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Louisiana Flusskrebse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.