Louisiana Flusskrebse vs 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage
Overall, 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Louisiana Flusskrebse | 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 15.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has 13% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has 64% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Louisiana Flusskrebse has 18% more protein (19 g vs 15.6 g).
- 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Louisiana Flusskrebse lists: Crustaceans.
Ingredients
Louisiana Flusskrebse
Procambarus clarkii, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Essigsäure, Milchsäure.
500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Louisiana Flusskrebse or 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage?
Overall, 500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
500G Ecrevisse Cuite Nage has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Louisiana Flusskrebse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.