Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa vs Boulettes de viande cuites kefta
Overall, Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa
Boulettes de viande cuites kefta
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lihapullia tomaattikastikees... | Boulettes de viande cuites k... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.4 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans, Blé, Fibres de blé, Huile de soja, Orge, Protéines de lait | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa has 31% fewer calories (154 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa has 30% less fat (9.8 g vs 14 g).
- Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa has 36% less saturated fat (3.4 g vs 5.3 g).
- Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has 63% less sugar (1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has 54% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa has 24% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has 46% more protein (14 g vs 7.5 g).
- Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has the better Nutri-Score.
- Boulettes de viande cuites kefta is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa lists: Milk, Soybeans, Blé, Fibres de blé, Huile de soja, Orge, Protéines de lait.
- Only Boulettes de viande cuites kefta lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa
Boulettes de viande grecques(cuites)66%(origine UE)[viande de bœuf partiellement hachée 45%, eau, chapelure(farine de blé, farine d'orge, sel de cuisine, paprika, poudre à lever : bicarbonate d'ammonium), protéines de soja, amidon modifié (maïs), protéines de lait, stabilisants (diphosphate tétrasodique, triphosphate pentasodique), fibres de carottes, fibres de blé, oignons séchés, sel de cuisine, persil, menthe, origan, paprika, poivre noir], sauce tomate 29,6% (purée de tomates triple concentré 6,1%, tomates pelées 5,6%, oignons, sel de cuisine, sucre, vin blanc, poivre rouge, poivre noir, cannelle), huile de soja.
Boulettes de viande cuites kefta
Viande bovine 41,1% (origine : France*), viande d'agneau 17,6% (origine : Nouvelle Zélande, ou origine UE **), eau, chapelure (farine de _blé_ (_gluten_), eau, sel, levure), oignon 5,9%, préparation à base d'_œuf_ liquide pasteurisé (blanc d'_œuf_ liquide, _œuf_ entier liquide, sel), amidon de pomme de terre, boulghour de _blé_ (_gluten_), concentré de tomate, flocon de tomate, huile d'olive vierge extra, menthe 0,3%, sel, gingembre 0,1%, cumin 0,1%, paprika en poudre 0,1%, poivre, persil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa or Boulettes de viande cuites kefta?
Overall, Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lihapullia tomaattikastikeessa has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boulettes de viande cuites kefta has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.