Lettost, 16% fett vs Original, Skivet hvitost
Overall, Lettost, 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lettost, 16% fett | Original, Skivet hvitost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lettost, 16% fett has 23% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 38% less fat (16 g vs 26 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 35% less saturated fat (11 g vs 17 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 10% more protein (29 g vs 26 g).
- Only Lettost, 16% fett lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Lettost, 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (E251), melkesyrekultur.
Original, Skivet hvitost
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (e251), melkesyrekultur
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lettost, 16% fett or Original, Skivet hvitost?
Overall, Lettost, 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lettost, 16% fett has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lettost, 16% fett has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.