Original, Skivet hvitost vs Julebrunost
Overall, Original, Skivet hvitost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original, Skivet hvitost | Julebrunost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 457 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 26 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 26% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 457 kcal).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has no sugar, while Julebrunost has 42 g.
- Julebrunost has 42% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 54% more protein (26 g vs 12 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Original, Skivet hvitost
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (e251), melkesyrekultur
Julebrunost
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original, Skivet hvitost or Julebrunost?
Overall, Original, Skivet hvitost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original, Skivet hvitost has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 457 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Original, Skivet hvitost has less sugar: 0 g versus 42 g per 100 g.