Original, Skivet hvitost vs Fløtemysost
Overall, Original, Skivet hvitost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original, Skivet hvitost | Fløtemysost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 338 kcal | 449 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 25% fewer calories (338 kcal vs 449 kcal).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 10% less fat (26 g vs 29 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has no sugar, while Fløtemysost has 38 g.
- Fløtemysost has 42% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has 65% more protein (26 g vs 9 g).
- Original, Skivet hvitost has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Original, Skivet hvitost
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (e251), melkesyrekultur
Fløtemysost
Pasteurisert melk, myse, fløte,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original, Skivet hvitost or Fløtemysost?
Overall, Original, Skivet hvitost has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Original, Skivet hvitost has fewer calories: 338 kcal versus 449 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Original, Skivet hvitost has less sugar: 0 g versus 38 g per 100 g.