Norvegia, lettost 16% fett vs Original, Skivet hvitost
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett
Original, Skivet hvitost
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Norvegia, lettost 16% fett | Original, Skivet hvitost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 338 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 21% fewer calories (268 kcal vs 338 kcal).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 38% less fat (16 g vs 26 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 41% less saturated fat (10 g vs 17 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 16% more protein (31 g vs 26 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Norvegia, lettost 16% fett lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, syrekultur, salt, mikrobiell løpe, modningskultur.
Original, Skivet hvitost
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (e251), melkesyrekultur
FAQ
Which is healthier: Norvegia, lettost 16% fett or Original, Skivet hvitost?
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.