Norvegia, lettost 16% fett vs Norvegia Økologisk Ost
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Norvegia, lettost 16% fett | Norvegia Økologisk Ost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 10 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 22% fewer calories (268 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 38% less fat (16 g vs 26 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 41% less saturated fat (10 g vs 17 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has 13% more protein (31 g vs 27 g).
- Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, syrekultur, salt, mikrobiell løpe, modningskultur.
Norvegia Økologisk Ost
pasteurisert økologisk melk, syrekultur, salt og mikrobiell løpe. Pakket i beskyttende atmosfære.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Norvegia, lettost 16% fett or Norvegia Økologisk Ost?
Overall, Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has fewer calories: 268 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Norvegia, lettost 16% fett has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.