Comparison
Lettost, 16% fett vs Julebrunost
Overall, Lettost, 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lettost, 16% fett | Julebrunost |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 457 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lettost, 16% fett has 43% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 457 kcal).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 38% less fat (16 g vs 26 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 35% less saturated fat (11 g vs 17 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has no sugar, while Julebrunost has 42 g.
- Julebrunost has 42% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has 59% more protein (29 g vs 12 g).
- Lettost, 16% fett has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lettost, 16% fett lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Lettost, 16% fett
Pasteurisert melk, salt, vegetarisk løpe, konserveringsmiddel (E251), melkesyrekultur.
Julebrunost
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lettost, 16% fett or Julebrunost?
Overall, Lettost, 16% fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lettost, 16% fett has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 457 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lettost, 16% fett has less sugar: 0 g versus 42 g per 100 g.