Comparison

LEOS Golden Vanilla vs Catalina Crunch

Overall, Catalina Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLEOS Golden VanillaCatalina Crunch
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 458 kcal 375 kcal
Fat 20.8 g 25 g
Saturated fat 10.4 g 8.3 g
Sugars 16.7 g 8.3 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.9 g
Fiber 16.7 g 12.5 g
Protein 4.2 g 16.7 g
Additives50
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Catalina Crunch has 18% fewer calories (375 kcal vs 458 kcal).
  • LEOS Golden Vanilla has 17% less fat (20.8 g vs 25 g).
  • Catalina Crunch has 20% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Catalina Crunch has 50% less sugar (8.3 g vs 16.7 g).
  • LEOS Golden Vanilla has 67% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
  • LEOS Golden Vanilla has 25% more fiber (16.7 g vs 12.5 g).
  • Catalina Crunch has 75% more protein (16.7 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Only LEOS Golden Vanilla lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

LEOS Golden Vanilla

Wheat Flour, Palm Fruit Oil*, Sugar, Vegetable Fiber (Chicory Root, Soluble Corn), Allulose, Sugar Cane Fiber, Sea Salt, Natural Flavor, Baking Soda, Sunflower Lecithin, Stevia Leaf Extract

Catalina Crunch

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: LEOS Golden Vanilla or Catalina Crunch?

Overall, Catalina Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Catalina Crunch has fewer calories: 375 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Catalina Crunch has less sugar: 8.3 g versus 16.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons