Lentils vs No-muh, rezent/piquant
Overall, Lentils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lentils | No-muh, rezent/piquant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 12.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 34.7 g | — |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- No-muh, rezent/piquant has 19% fewer calories (294 kcal vs 361 kcal).
- Lentils has 90% less fat (2 g vs 20 g).
- Lentils has no saturated fat, while No-muh, rezent/piquant has 12.9 g.
- Lentils has 98% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.1 g).
- Lentils has 69% more protein (22.4 g vs 7 g).
- Lentils has the better Nutri-Score.
- Lentils is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Lentils
Lentils
No-muh, rezent/piquant
Attejnalivo zu Kase / Véo}taljen AD) Zutaten: Wasser, ntcht gehaflete pflanzltche Ole und fette (Kokos - Kartottelstarke, Hefe, Reismehl, NussmUS (100 % Stetnsaz Aroma Gewurze, Bindemjttel (Carraghenan); Milchsàure (vegetabii) eau. huiles et graisses végétales non hydre (noixde coco ftwile de tournesol). fécule de pommes de terre, levure, farine de riz, beurre de noix, sel gemme. arôme (végétal), épices, liant (carraghénane). (végétai) h#züüifssea: Die braunen Punkte slammen von Mahgeln/SteinsalZ4 Mandeln/amandes 48h
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lentils or No-muh, rezent/piquant?
Overall, Lentils has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
No-muh, rezent/piquant has fewer calories: 294 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lentils has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.